We declare in the words of the Irish Republican Proclamation the right of the people of Ireland to the ownership of Ireland, and to the unfettered control of Irish destinies to be indefeasible, and in the language of our first President. Pádraíg Mac Phiarais, we declare that the Nation's sovereignty extends not only to all men and women of the Nation, but to all its material possessions, the Nation's soil and all its resources, all the wealth and all the wealth-producing processes within the Nation, and with him we reaffirm that all right to private property must be subordinated to the public right and welfare.
We declare that we desire our country to be ruled in accordance with the principles of Liberty, Equality, and Justice for all, which alone can secure permanence of Government in the willing adhesion of the people.
We affirm the duty of every man and woman to give allegiance and service to the Commonwealth, and declare it is the duty of the Nation to assure that every citizen shall have opportunity to spend his or her strength and faculties in the service of the people. In return for willing service, we, in the name of the Republic, declare the right of every citizen to an adequate share of the produce of the Nation's labour.
It shall be the first duty of the Government of the Republic to make provision for the physical, mental and spiritual well-being of the children, to secure that no child shall suffer hunger or cold from lack of food, clothing, or shelter, but that all shall be provided with the means and facilities requisite for their proper education and training as Citizens of a Free and Gaelic Ireland.
The Irish Republic fully realises the necessity of abolishing the present odious, degrading and foreign Poor Law System, substituting therefor a sympathetic native scheme for the care of the Nation's aged and infirm, who shall not be regarded as a burden, but rather entitled to the Nation's gratitude and consideration. Likewise it shall be the duty of the Republic to take such measures as will safeguard the health of the people and ensure the physical as well as the moral well-being of the Nation.
It shall be our duty to promote the development of the Nation's resources, to increase the productivity of its soil, to exploit its mineral deposits, peat bogs, and fisheries, its waterways and harbours, in the interests and for the benefit of the Irish people.
It shall be the duty of the Republic to adopt all measures necessary for the recreation and invigoration of our Industries, and to ensure their being developed on the most beneficial and progressive co-operative and industrial lines. With the adoption of an extensive Irish Consular Service, trade with foreign Nations shall be revived on terms of mutual advantage and goodwill, and while undertaking the organisation of the Nation's trade, import and export, it shall be the duty of the Republic to prevent the shipment from Ireland of food and other necessaries until the wants of the Irish people are fully satisfied and the future provided for.
It shall also devolve upon the National Government to seek co-operation of the Governments of other countries in determining a standard of Social and Industrial Legislation with a view to a general and lasting improvement in the conditions under which the working classes live and labour.
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
The Democratic Programme - A legacy to Cherish
The inaugural meeting of the first Dail took place on January 21, 1919.Many feel that the most important document of that historic first day was the Declaration of Independence. This took the form of ratifying (to great applause) "the establishment of the Irish Republic . . . proclaimed on Easter Monday 1916 by the Irish Republican Army'' and now receiving the allegiance of "the overwhelming majority'' of the Irish people.
Other business transacted on opening day included the drafting of a short, provisional constitution; the issuing of a rhetorically high-minded message "to the free nations of the world''; and the adoption of a Democratic Programme, unanimously approved without debate.
This Democratic Programme would later become a point of devision as the treaty split the Irish Republican government and army.
But what is the Democratic Programme, and what is its lasting legacy?
Despite being passed unanimously at that first meeting, the Democratic Programme was not accepted by everyone from the start. Some seen it as a necessary pay back to the Labour party, who had stood by to allow Sinn Féin a clear run at the 1918 elections. (In fact the programme was drafted with the assistance of Thomas Johnson, the leader of the Labour Party.) They did not see it has something that belonged to the nation they were fighting to build.
The Irish Times of the day discerned a deep division within Sinn Féin between moderates and extremists. On one side there was “a body of idealists who nurture themselves quite honestly on visions of an independent, but peaceful and pious Ireland”. On the other, there were those who planned “to apply the principles of Lenin and Trotsky to Irish affairs. It is working for the disintegration of society and the confiscation of all property, public and private”.
Irish nationalists in general had always believed that an independent Ireland would be prosperous and just; Sinn Fein's social policy specifically envisaged the development of national resources for the public good. The Democratic Programme went much further however.
It was a radical manifesto with some striking phrases, e.g. "no child shall suffer hunger or cold from lack of food, clothing or shelter''. The programme outlined a socialist policy which included: the public ownership of the means of production, natural resources and "wealth"; state provision of education for children and care for the elderly; ensuring that children receive food; promotion of industrial development as well as the exploitation of natural resources. The historian Diarmaid Ferriter (2004) has argued that this document "was an indication that only a certain type of nebulous, ambiguous rhetoric concerning equality and redistribution would be tolerated by Sinn Féin." The Labour Party inserted a clause that private property was to be subordinate "to the public right and welfare."
IRB leaders, like P S O'Hegarty, single-mindedly concerned with ending British rule, dismissed it as "socialist theoretical high-sounding jargon''. It hardly reflected the mind of a lower middle-class Dail and certainly not the sentiments of a recently-established peasant proprietorship.
One of the greatest supporters of the Democratic Programme was the great Irish Socialist, Liam Mellowes. Mellowes, who spent the Summers of his youth in North Wexford, felt that the Anglo-Irish Treaty as signed to be a betrayal of the Irish Republic, saying, in the Treaty Debates of 1921–22:
“ We do not seek to make this country a materially great country at the expense of its honour in any way whatsoever. We would rather have this country poor and indigent, we would rather have the people of Ireland eking out a poor existence on the soil; as long as they possessed their souls, their minds, and their honour. This fight has been for something more than the fleshpots of Empire.”
He wrote a social programme based on the Dáil's Democratic Programme of 1919 aimed at winning popular support for the anti-Treaty cause, and was a firm believer in the ideals of the original programme for the rest of his short life.
Today, Sinn Féin continue to site the Democratic Programme of 1919 as an important historical text, which all the Irish governments since have failed to even try and implement. The spirit of this document lives on today in the republican socialist tradition, and is as relevant to us now as it was on that day in January 1919.
Other business transacted on opening day included the drafting of a short, provisional constitution; the issuing of a rhetorically high-minded message "to the free nations of the world''; and the adoption of a Democratic Programme, unanimously approved without debate.
This Democratic Programme would later become a point of devision as the treaty split the Irish Republican government and army.
![]() |
| The First Dail |
Despite being passed unanimously at that first meeting, the Democratic Programme was not accepted by everyone from the start. Some seen it as a necessary pay back to the Labour party, who had stood by to allow Sinn Féin a clear run at the 1918 elections. (In fact the programme was drafted with the assistance of Thomas Johnson, the leader of the Labour Party.) They did not see it has something that belonged to the nation they were fighting to build.
The Irish Times of the day discerned a deep division within Sinn Féin between moderates and extremists. On one side there was “a body of idealists who nurture themselves quite honestly on visions of an independent, but peaceful and pious Ireland”. On the other, there were those who planned “to apply the principles of Lenin and Trotsky to Irish affairs. It is working for the disintegration of society and the confiscation of all property, public and private”.
Irish nationalists in general had always believed that an independent Ireland would be prosperous and just; Sinn Fein's social policy specifically envisaged the development of national resources for the public good. The Democratic Programme went much further however.
It was a radical manifesto with some striking phrases, e.g. "no child shall suffer hunger or cold from lack of food, clothing or shelter''. The programme outlined a socialist policy which included: the public ownership of the means of production, natural resources and "wealth"; state provision of education for children and care for the elderly; ensuring that children receive food; promotion of industrial development as well as the exploitation of natural resources. The historian Diarmaid Ferriter (2004) has argued that this document "was an indication that only a certain type of nebulous, ambiguous rhetoric concerning equality and redistribution would be tolerated by Sinn Féin." The Labour Party inserted a clause that private property was to be subordinate "to the public right and welfare."
IRB leaders, like P S O'Hegarty, single-mindedly concerned with ending British rule, dismissed it as "socialist theoretical high-sounding jargon''. It hardly reflected the mind of a lower middle-class Dail and certainly not the sentiments of a recently-established peasant proprietorship.
One of the greatest supporters of the Democratic Programme was the great Irish Socialist, Liam Mellowes. Mellowes, who spent the Summers of his youth in North Wexford, felt that the Anglo-Irish Treaty as signed to be a betrayal of the Irish Republic, saying, in the Treaty Debates of 1921–22:
“ We do not seek to make this country a materially great country at the expense of its honour in any way whatsoever. We would rather have this country poor and indigent, we would rather have the people of Ireland eking out a poor existence on the soil; as long as they possessed their souls, their minds, and their honour. This fight has been for something more than the fleshpots of Empire.”
![]() |
| Liam Mellowes at Bodenstown |
Today, Sinn Féin continue to site the Democratic Programme of 1919 as an important historical text, which all the Irish governments since have failed to even try and implement. The spirit of this document lives on today in the republican socialist tradition, and is as relevant to us now as it was on that day in January 1919.
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
What is a Free Nation? - James Connolly (1916)

We are moved to ask this question because of the extraordinary confusion of thought upon the subject which prevails in this country, due principally to the pernicious and misleading newspaper garbage upon which the Irish public has been fed for the past twenty-five years.
Our Irish daily newspapers have done all that human agencies could do to confuse the public mind upon the question of what the essentials of a free nation are, what a free nation must be, and what a nation cannot submit to lose without losing its title to be free.
It is because of this extraordinary newspaper-created ignorance that we find so many people enlisting in the British army under the belief that Ireland has at long last attained to the status of a free nation, and that therefore the relations between Ireland and England have at last been placed upon the satisfactory basis of freedom. Ireland and England, they have been told, are now sister nations, joined in the bond of Empire, but each enjoying equal liberties – the equal liberties of nations equally free. How many recruits this idea sent into the British army in the first flush of the war it would be difficult to estimate, but they were assuredly numbered by the thousand.
The Irish Parliamentary Party, which at every stage of the Home Rule game has been outwitted and bulldozed by Carson and the Unionists, which had surrendered every point and yielded every advantage to the skilful campaign of the aristocratic Orange military clique in times of peace, behaved in equally as cowardly and treacherous a manner in the crisis of war.
There are few men in whom the blast of the bugles of war do not arouse the fighting instinct, do not excite to some chivalrous impulses if only for a moment. But the Irish Parliamentary Party must be reckoned amongst that few. In them the bugles of war only awakened the impulse to sell the bodies of their countrymen as cannon fodder in exchange for the gracious smiles of the rulers of England. In them the call of war sounded only as a call to emulate in prostitution. They heard the call of war – and set out to prove that the nationalists of Ireland were more slavish than the Orangemen of Ireland, would more readily kill and be killed at the bidding of an Empire that despised them both.
The Orangemen had at least the satisfaction that they were called upon to fight abroad in order to save an Empire they had been prepared to fight to retain unaltered at home; but the nationalists were called upon to fight abroad to save an Empire whose rulers in their most generous moments had refused to grant their country the essentials of freedom in nationhood.
Fighting abroad the Orangeman knows that he fights to preserve the power of the aristocratic rulers whom he followed at home; fighting abroad the nationalist soldier is fighting to maintain unimpaired the power of those who conspired to shoot him down at home when he asked for a small instalment of freedom.
The Orangeman says: “We will fight for the Empire abroad if its rulers will promise not to force us to submit to Home Rule.” And the rulers say heartily: “It is unthinkable that we should coerce Ulster for any such purpose.”
The Irish Parliamentary Party and its press said: “We will prove ourselves fit to be in the British Empire by fighting for it, in the hopes that after the war is over we will get Home Rule.” And the rulers of the British Empire say: “Well, you know what we have promised Carson, but send out the Irish rabble to fight for us, and we will, ahem, consider your application after the war.” Whereat, all the Parliamentary leaders and their press call the world to witness that they have won a wonderful victory!
James Fintan Lalor spoke and conceived of Ireland as a “discrowned queen, taking back her own with an armed hand”. Our Parliamentarians treat Ireland, their country, as an old prostitute selling her soul for the promise of favours to come, and in the spirit of that conception of their country they are conducting their political campaign.
That they should be able to do so with even the partial success that for a while attended their apostasy was possible only because so few in Ireland really understood the answer to the question that stands at the head of this article.
What is a free nation? A free nation is one which possesses absolute control over all its own internal resources and powers, and which has no restriction upon its intercourse with all other nations similarly circumstanced except the restrictions placed upon it by nature. Is that the case of Ireland? If the Home Rule Bill were in operation would that be the case of Ireland? To both questions the answer is: no, most emphatically, NO!
A free nation must have complete control over its own harbours, to open them or close them at will, or shut out any commodity, or allow it to enter in, just as it seemed best to suit the well-being of its own people, and in obedience to their wishes, and entirely free of the interference of any other nation, and in complete disregard of the wishes of any other nation. Short of that power no nation possesses the first essentials of freedom.
Does Ireland possess such control? No. Will the Home Rule Bill give such control over Irish harbours in Ireland? It will not. Ireland must open its harbours when it suits the interests of another nation, England, and must shut its harbours when it suits the interests of another nation, England; and the Home Rule Bill pledges Ireland to accept this loss of national control for ever.
How would you like to live in a house if the keys of all the doors of that house were in the pockets of a rival of yours who had often robbed you in the past? Would you be satisfied if he told you that he and you were going to be friends for ever more, but insisted upon you signing an agreement to leave him control of all your doors, and custody of all your keys? This is the condition of Ireland today, and will be the condition of Ireland under Redmond and Devlin’s precious Home Rule Bill.
That is worth dying for in Flanders, the Balkans, Egypt or India, is it not?
A free nation must have full power to nurse industries to health, either by government encouragement or by government prohibition of the sale of goods of foreign rivals. It may be foolish to do either, but a nation is not free unless it has that power, as all free nations in the world have today. Ireland has no such power, will have no such power under Home Rule. The nourishing of industries in Ireland hurts capitalists in England, therefore this power is expressly withheld from Ireland.
A free nation must have full power to alter, amend, or abolish or modify the laws under which the property of its citizens is held in obedience to the demand of its own citizens for any such alteration, amendment, abolition, or modification. Every free nation has that power; Ireland does not have it, and is not allowed it by the Home Rule Bill.
It is recognized today that it is upon the wise treatment of economic power and resources, and upon the wise ordering of social activities that the future of nations depends. That nation will be the richest and happiest which has the foresight to marshal the most carefully its natural resources to national ends. But Ireland is denied this power, and will be denied it under Home Rule. Ireland’s rich natural resources, and the kindly genius of its children, are not to be allowed to combine for the satisfaction of Irish wants, save in so far as their combination can operate on lines approved of by the rulers of England.
Her postal service, her telegraphs, her wireless, her customs and excise, her coinage, her fighting forces, her relations with other nations, her merchant commerce, her property relations, her national activities, her legislative sovereignty – all the things that are essential to a nation’s freedom are denied to Ireland now, and are denied to her under the provisions of the Home Rule Bill. And Irish soldiers in the English Army are fighting in Flanders to win for Belgium, we are told, all those things which the British Empire, now as in the past, denies to Ireland.
There is not a Belgian patriot who would not prefer to see his country devastated by war a hundred times rather than accept as a settlement for Belgium what Redmond and Devlin have accepted for Ireland. Have we Irish been fashioned in meaner clay than the Belgians?
There is not a pacifist in England who would wish to end the war without Belgium being restored to full possession of all those national rights and powers which Ireland does not possess, and which the Home Rule Bill denies to her. But these same pacifists never mention Ireland when discussing or suggesting terms of settlement. Why should they? Belgium is fighting for her independence, but Irishmen are fighting for the Empire that denies Ireland every right that Belgians think worth fighting for.
And yet Belgium as a nation is, so to speak, but a creation of yesterday – an artificial product of the schemes of statesmen. Whereas, the frontiers of Ireland, the ineffaceable marks of the separate existence of Ireland, are as old as Europe itself, the handiwork of the Almighty, not of politicians. And as the marks of Ireland’s separate nationality were not made by politicians so they cannot be unmade by them.
As the separate individual is to the family, so the separate nation is to humanity. The perfect family is that which best draws out the inner powers of the individual, the most perfect world is that in which the separate existence of nations is held most sacred. There can be no perfect Europe in which Ireland is denied even the least of its national rights; there can be no worthy Ireland whose children brook tamely such denial. If such denial has been accepted by soulless slaves of politicians then it must be repudiated by Irish men and women whose souls are still their own.
The peaceful progress of the future requires the possession by Ireland of all the national rights now denied to her. Only in such possession can the workers of Ireland see stability and security for the fruits of their toil and organization. A destiny not of our fashioning has chosen this generation as the one called upon for the supreme act of self-sacrifice – to die if need be that our race might live in freedom.
Are we worthy of the choice? Only by our response to the call can that question be answered.
The Irish Flag - James Connolly (1916)

The Council of the Irish Citizen Army has resolved, after grave and earnest deliberation, to hoist the green flag of Ireland over Liberty Hall, as over a fortress held for Ireland by the arms of Irishmen.
This is a momentous decision in the most serious crisis Ireland has witnessed in our day and generation. It will, we are sure, send a thrill through the hearts of every true Irish man and woman, and send the red blood coursing fiercely along the veins of every lover of the race.
It means that in the midst of and despite the treasons and backslidings of leaders and guides, in the midst of and despite all the weaknesses, corruption and moral cowardice of a section of the people, in the midst of and despite all this there still remains in Ireland a spot where a body of true men and women are ready to hoist, gather round, and to defend the flag made sacred by all the sufferings of all the martyrs of the past.
Since this unholy war first started we have seen every symbol of Irish freedom desecrated to the purposes of the enemy, we have witnessed the prostitution of every holy Irish tradition. That the young men of Ireland might be seduced into the service of the nation that denies every national power to their country, we have seen appeals made to our love of freedom, to our religious instincts, to our sympathy for the oppressed, to our kinship with suffering.
The power that for seven hundred years has waged bitter and unrelenting war upon the freedom of Ireland, and that still declares that the rights of Ireland must forever remain subordinate to the interests of the British empire, hypocritically appealed to our young men to enlist under her banner and shed their blood ‘in the interests of freedom’.
The power whose reign in Ireland has been one long carnival of corruption and debauchery of civic virtue, and which has rioted in the debasement and degradation of everything Irish men and women hold sacred, appealed to us in the name of religion to fight for her as the champion of christendom.
The power which holds in subjection more of the world’s population than any other power on the globe, and holds them in subjection as slaves without any guarantee of freedom or power of self-government, this power that sets Catholic against Protestant, the Hindu against the Mohammedan, the yellow man against the brown, and keeps them quarrelling with each other whilst she robs and murders them all – this power appeals to Ireland to send her sons to fight under England’s banner for the cause of the oppressed. The power whose rule in Ireland has made of Ireland a desert, and made the history of our race read like the records of a shambles, as she plans for the annihilation of another race appeals to our manhood to fight for her because of our sympathy for the suffering, and of our hatred of oppression.
For generations the shamrock was banned as a national emblem of Ireland, but in her extremity England uses the shamrock as a means for exciting in foolish Irishmen loyalty to England. For centuries the green flag of Ireland was a thing accurst and hated by the English garrison in Ireland, as it is still in their inmost hearts. But in India, in Egypt, in Flanders, in Gallipoli, the green flag is used by our rulers to encourage Irish soldiers of England to give up their lives for the power that denies their country the right of nationhood. Green flags wave over recruiting offices in Ireland and England as a bait to lure on poor fools to dishonourable deaths in England’s uniform.
The national press of Ireland, the true national press, uncorrupted and unterrified, has largely succeeded in turning back the tide of demoralization, and opening up the minds of the Irish public to a realization of the truth about the position of their country in the war. The national press of Ireland is a real flag of freedom flying for Ireland despite the enemy, but it is well that also there should fly in Dublin the green flag of this country as a rallying point of our forces and embodiment of all our hopes. Where better could that flag fly than over the unconquered citadel of the Irish working class, Liberty Hall, the fortress of the militant working class of Ireland.
We are out for Ireland for the Irish. But who are the Irish? Not the rack-renting, slum-owning landlord; not the sweating, profit-grinding capitalist; not the sleek and oily lawyer; not the prostitute pressman – the hired liars of the enemy. Not these are the Irish upon whom the future depends. Not these, but the Irish working class, the only secure foundation upon which a free nation can be reared.
The cause of labour is the cause of Ireland, the cause of Ireland is the cause of labour. They cannot be dissevered. Ireland seeks freedom. Labour seeks that an Ireland free should be the sole mistress of her own destiny, supreme owner of all material things within and upon her soil. Labour seeks to make the free Irish nation the guardian of the interests of the people of Ireland, and to secure that end would vest in that free Irish nation all property rights as against the claims of the individual, with the end in view that the individual may be enriched by the nation, and not by the spoiling of his fellows.
Having in view such a high and holy function for the nation to perform, is it not well and fitting that we of the working class should fight for the freedom of the nation from foreign rule, as the first requisite for the free development of the national powers needed for our class? It is so fitting. Therefore on Sunday, 16 April 1916 the green flag of Ireland will be solemnly hoisted over Liberty Hall as the symbol of our faith in freedom, and as a token to all the world that the working class of Dublin stands for the cause of Ireland, and the cause of Ireland is the cause of a separate and distinct nationality.
In these days of doubt, despair, and resurgent hope we fling our banner to the breeze, the flag of our fathers, the symbol of our national redemption, the sunburst shining over an Ireland re-born.
Monday, September 13, 2010
Biased Wexford Media fake opinion piece
This blog was disgusted to read another "public opinion" in a local newspaper this week, to find the results were one hundred percent in favour of the paper, and the current government's view of how this country should run. The piece in question asked eight "random" people did they think that social employment was a good idea. Of course none of them voiced any concern that the governments latest ill thought out venture , but all weighted in unanimously behind the plan.

I mean how could anyone not trusts the plans of a government that brought us the HSE and NAMA?
One woman even said that it would give the unemployed an incentive to go out and find work!
Where exactly Mrs. Random? Oh yeah, America.... Australia....England. Emigrate and find work serfs, because your the ones who caused the recession. Forget about all that income tax you paid during the Tiger years. That's doesn't matter now. The government and their friends in the media need someone to blame, and guess who's getting it? YOU!

Watch the papers and news in the lead up to the coming "doomsday" budget. Watch out for the headlines. "Unemployed will have to work for their dole" "Sounds reasonable, gives them an incentive to find work" Government borrowing record amounts to pay unemployed "Those pesky buggers. Why cant they get a job?" Government applauded by EU for handling of financial crisis, but efforts hampered by unemployed "They're the ones to blame for the whole thing, bloody unemployed!"
Yes, don't blame the greedy bankers or incompetent heads of our civil service, or even the worst government that has ever led a civilised nation.
No, blame it on the unemployed. "Then the people wont get upset when we cut their benefits to shreds in the next budget"
Would the media lie to you?
We were led to believe that the shell to sea protesters in Rossport were lunatics despite it being a proven fact that they were ordinary people trying to protect their community. Tony O' Reilly used his media arsenal to colour the people of Ireland's perception of these campaigners because he owns his own off shore assets, and fears victory for the shell to sea campaign will cost him.

But lets go back to Mrs. Random who says that the unemployed need an incentive to go out and look for work, in a country where over a thousand people applied for three jobs in a new cinema. Maybe if this woman rose her head above the TV/Radio?Papers propaganda curtain that holds so many of our citizens in a limbo of lies, she might see that her friends and neighbours who have lost their jobs are not lazy bums conspiring to feed off the state, but the actual people who worked hard during the Tiger years, paying high taxes that made Bertie Aherns Fianna Fail government the richest in the history of the state, and one of the wealthiest in the world.
How did they spend this money?
After looking after their friends in the golden circle, they squandered what little was left . Now they are borrowing money, not to pay our unemployed who have already more than contributed to this state during the good times, and will so again under a change of management, but to bail out failed banks.
If Mrs. Random could just break through the veil of lies for one moment, she might see that it wasn't those who are now suffering on welfare who caused the recession, but those who were in charge of the things that we took for granted, our banks, our big Businesses, our media and our government.

The next time our local media decide to run their totally impartial opinion piece, maybe they'll make Mrs Random take her head out of her arse before she answers the question. And maybe they'll print the many answers we know they received that didn't agree with their own views.

I mean how could anyone not trusts the plans of a government that brought us the HSE and NAMA?
One woman even said that it would give the unemployed an incentive to go out and find work!
Where exactly Mrs. Random? Oh yeah, America.... Australia....England. Emigrate and find work serfs, because your the ones who caused the recession. Forget about all that income tax you paid during the Tiger years. That's doesn't matter now. The government and their friends in the media need someone to blame, and guess who's getting it? YOU!

Watch the papers and news in the lead up to the coming "doomsday" budget. Watch out for the headlines. "Unemployed will have to work for their dole" "Sounds reasonable, gives them an incentive to find work" Government borrowing record amounts to pay unemployed "Those pesky buggers. Why cant they get a job?" Government applauded by EU for handling of financial crisis, but efforts hampered by unemployed "They're the ones to blame for the whole thing, bloody unemployed!"
Yes, don't blame the greedy bankers or incompetent heads of our civil service, or even the worst government that has ever led a civilised nation.
No, blame it on the unemployed. "Then the people wont get upset when we cut their benefits to shreds in the next budget"
Would the media lie to you?
We were led to believe that the shell to sea protesters in Rossport were lunatics despite it being a proven fact that they were ordinary people trying to protect their community. Tony O' Reilly used his media arsenal to colour the people of Ireland's perception of these campaigners because he owns his own off shore assets, and fears victory for the shell to sea campaign will cost him.

But lets go back to Mrs. Random who says that the unemployed need an incentive to go out and look for work, in a country where over a thousand people applied for three jobs in a new cinema. Maybe if this woman rose her head above the TV/Radio?Papers propaganda curtain that holds so many of our citizens in a limbo of lies, she might see that her friends and neighbours who have lost their jobs are not lazy bums conspiring to feed off the state, but the actual people who worked hard during the Tiger years, paying high taxes that made Bertie Aherns Fianna Fail government the richest in the history of the state, and one of the wealthiest in the world.
How did they spend this money?
After looking after their friends in the golden circle, they squandered what little was left . Now they are borrowing money, not to pay our unemployed who have already more than contributed to this state during the good times, and will so again under a change of management, but to bail out failed banks.
If Mrs. Random could just break through the veil of lies for one moment, she might see that it wasn't those who are now suffering on welfare who caused the recession, but those who were in charge of the things that we took for granted, our banks, our big Businesses, our media and our government.

The next time our local media decide to run their totally impartial opinion piece, maybe they'll make Mrs Random take her head out of her arse before she answers the question. And maybe they'll print the many answers we know they received that didn't agree with their own views.
Sunday, September 12, 2010
Carry on Elizabeth
Sometime next year, the Fianna Fail (the Republican party) and the Greens (Fighting wasteful spending of tax payers money) are going to hold a civic reception, the expense of which Ireland has never seen before. The reception will be held for a number of reason.
A grand gesture by a poor Taoiseach who desperately wants his Bertie/Peace Process historical moment. What better way to get his “reeling in the years” moment than by leading the english queen down O’ Connell Street, a bowl of shamrock in one hand and a miniature union jack in the other. The Artane boys band can play god save the queen and the Orange Order can set up on the back of a trailer, handing out lollipops to kids.

We’ll all forget about Cowen’s drunken past Ard Fheis moments, downing Guiness and roaring the boys of Kilmichael into some young ones ear. Hes political correct these days. “The Shinners are beaten”. No need to dig up anymore dead republicans and reintern them in Glasnevin. Better to be the Taoiseach that brought the english queen to Dublin.
Well, in fairness, he has no real choice. If he reneges now, the O’ Reilly Media Cartel will bring his government down and crush Fianna Fail the way Enda Kenny could only ever day dream of doing. Its not like O’ Reilly has not collapsed governments before! The king of the west Brits, and Kevin Myers role model, was given special permission by a Fianna Fail (the republican party) government to be knighted by the english queen back in the day when his acceptance of such an offer should have meant the loss of his Irish citizenship. If anyone wants the queen here more than Cowen, its Tony O’.
Bringing the english queen to Dublin will also impress the Irish governments friends and bosses in Brussels. “Look, we lost the first Lisbon Treaty vote to the radicals but they couldn't stop us bringing Liz to Dublin. We’re in the worst recession these people have known and still we got away with spending millions of tax payers euro on her holida....I mean her state visit.”
So lets recap. Who benefits from the english queens visit?
The Government (including the republican party, but don't tell anyone, because they’re “republican”. The media. Big Business. The EU.
Who doesn't benefit?
YOU!!!
It cost €8 million for George Bush’s security bill alone during his presidential visit to Shannon a few years back. The english queen is coming to our nations capital and largest city, home of several historical sites of rebellion against her country, and home to thousands of unemployed people who wont like it very much when they finally realise that they are the ones paying for this “reeling in the years” moment.
So when you watch the terrible cuts of the next budget, or see another public transport link closed, or hospital downgraded, just remember one thing. Not only are you suffering to bail out a shower of corrupt, incompetent bankers. Your also sacrificing the everyday comforts of life so a foreign monarch can come over here to make some rich people feel good about themselves.
This Reeling in the Years moment will be brought to you by the Irish people. (At great expense)
Carry on Elizabeth!
A grand gesture by a poor Taoiseach who desperately wants his Bertie/Peace Process historical moment. What better way to get his “reeling in the years” moment than by leading the english queen down O’ Connell Street, a bowl of shamrock in one hand and a miniature union jack in the other. The Artane boys band can play god save the queen and the Orange Order can set up on the back of a trailer, handing out lollipops to kids.

We’ll all forget about Cowen’s drunken past Ard Fheis moments, downing Guiness and roaring the boys of Kilmichael into some young ones ear. Hes political correct these days. “The Shinners are beaten”. No need to dig up anymore dead republicans and reintern them in Glasnevin. Better to be the Taoiseach that brought the english queen to Dublin.
Well, in fairness, he has no real choice. If he reneges now, the O’ Reilly Media Cartel will bring his government down and crush Fianna Fail the way Enda Kenny could only ever day dream of doing. Its not like O’ Reilly has not collapsed governments before! The king of the west Brits, and Kevin Myers role model, was given special permission by a Fianna Fail (the republican party) government to be knighted by the english queen back in the day when his acceptance of such an offer should have meant the loss of his Irish citizenship. If anyone wants the queen here more than Cowen, its Tony O’.
Bringing the english queen to Dublin will also impress the Irish governments friends and bosses in Brussels. “Look, we lost the first Lisbon Treaty vote to the radicals but they couldn't stop us bringing Liz to Dublin. We’re in the worst recession these people have known and still we got away with spending millions of tax payers euro on her holida....I mean her state visit.”
So lets recap. Who benefits from the english queens visit?
The Government (including the republican party, but don't tell anyone, because they’re “republican”. The media. Big Business. The EU.
Who doesn't benefit?
YOU!!!
It cost €8 million for George Bush’s security bill alone during his presidential visit to Shannon a few years back. The english queen is coming to our nations capital and largest city, home of several historical sites of rebellion against her country, and home to thousands of unemployed people who wont like it very much when they finally realise that they are the ones paying for this “reeling in the years” moment.
So when you watch the terrible cuts of the next budget, or see another public transport link closed, or hospital downgraded, just remember one thing. Not only are you suffering to bail out a shower of corrupt, incompetent bankers. Your also sacrificing the everyday comforts of life so a foreign monarch can come over here to make some rich people feel good about themselves.
This Reeling in the Years moment will be brought to you by the Irish people. (At great expense)
Carry on Elizabeth!
Friday, September 10, 2010
The Ballad of Ed O' Brien
Dear mother Ireland, you grieve once again,
Another Irish family share your suffering and pain,
A brave volunteer gone long before his time,
But the struggle goes on now, for its his, yours and mine.
Chorus
Brave Ed O' Brien, For Ireland gave all,
For the love of his country, he answered her call,
Now he lies on a hill overlooking Gorey town,
His courage and daring forever renown.
In Wexfords green valley, he learned as a boy,
Of the cruel English tyrants attempts to destroy,
Our right as a nation to determine our fate,
So he followed in the footsteps of the men of '98.
Chorus
Its been eight hundred years since they came to our land,
and through cruelty and injustice, united we stand,
And with lads like brave Edward we know we'll be free,
When we drive them back to England across the Irish sea.
Chorus
Another Irish family share your suffering and pain,
A brave volunteer gone long before his time,
But the struggle goes on now, for its his, yours and mine.
Chorus
Brave Ed O' Brien, For Ireland gave all,
For the love of his country, he answered her call,
Now he lies on a hill overlooking Gorey town,
His courage and daring forever renown.
In Wexfords green valley, he learned as a boy,
Of the cruel English tyrants attempts to destroy,
Our right as a nation to determine our fate,
So he followed in the footsteps of the men of '98.
Chorus
Its been eight hundred years since they came to our land,
and through cruelty and injustice, united we stand,
And with lads like brave Edward we know we'll be free,
When we drive them back to England across the Irish sea.
Chorus
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
People Power in Wexford
On the seventh of April last, Iarnród Éireann announced nationally that the Rosslare to Waterford Rail Line was to be closed. This announcement coincided with the first public meeting of the "Save the Rosslare to Waterford Rail Line" campaign, who had succeeded in highlighting the issue on Facebook, where they had attracted 1500 supporters at that point.
The meeting was shared by a young unknown Bridgetown woman named Tanya Fenelon, who had founded the campaign after realising how the loss of the train would effect her own family and neighbours. Also scattered among the large crowd were TDs and councillors, and reps from all the major political parties.
In the months that followed there were protests, petitions, surveys, meetings and alot of egg on the face for the big guns of Iarnród Éireann. Despite obvious involvement of political parties, these events were all people-centric and revolved around the incredible work load of Tanya Fenelon and the closest members of her committee.

When Rathangan SF attended that first meeting in early April, we realised immediately that this campaign would never have the mass appeal of the campaigns to save hospitals or to stop welfare cuts. It wasn't a "sexy" campaign! It was a lukewarm issue, and despite the fact that the rail line was much needed by the people of South Wexford, it just didn't attract major attention.
Iarnród Éireann must have thought that they had it in the bag.
They thought wrong.
The inventive thinking, hard work and sheer determination of the Save the Rail campaign turned the issue on its head. Iarnród Éireann were told that they legally couldn't close the line without permission from the National Transport Authority. IE's claims that the line was not making money and that only twenty five people used it everyday were exposed as untrue propaganda.
No Rail Line makes money in rural Ireland, but IE only had one ticket collector between four trains, giving you a one in four chance of riding free! The lie about only twenty five people using the train was proven false by the campaigners making daily head counts of passengers.

Interest grew in the issue, and support for the campaign grew. The South East Chamber of Commerce threw their weight behind the campaign, claiming closure was economic suicide. So did surrounding local authorities, and in theory, all of the political parties of the south east.
On Friday the third of September, The NTA granted permission to IE to close the line. Iarnród Éireann celebrated and the local media reported their victory. However, once again we were being hoodwinked by semi state propaganda. It was left to Tanya Fenelon, the unknown Bridgetown woman who had started a facebook campaign a year earlier, to reveal the truth. The line would close, but with conditions.
The line would have to be maintained. An enhanced bus service would have to provided for South Wexford, and most importantly, private operators would be encouraged to reopen the line.

So the Government have allowed another public service to fall, but thanks to the actions of the Save the Rosslare to Waterford Rail Line campaign,there is still hope. People power, the rebel spirit, is alive in Wexford.
The meeting was shared by a young unknown Bridgetown woman named Tanya Fenelon, who had founded the campaign after realising how the loss of the train would effect her own family and neighbours. Also scattered among the large crowd were TDs and councillors, and reps from all the major political parties.
In the months that followed there were protests, petitions, surveys, meetings and alot of egg on the face for the big guns of Iarnród Éireann. Despite obvious involvement of political parties, these events were all people-centric and revolved around the incredible work load of Tanya Fenelon and the closest members of her committee.
When Rathangan SF attended that first meeting in early April, we realised immediately that this campaign would never have the mass appeal of the campaigns to save hospitals or to stop welfare cuts. It wasn't a "sexy" campaign! It was a lukewarm issue, and despite the fact that the rail line was much needed by the people of South Wexford, it just didn't attract major attention.
Iarnród Éireann must have thought that they had it in the bag.
They thought wrong.
The inventive thinking, hard work and sheer determination of the Save the Rail campaign turned the issue on its head. Iarnród Éireann were told that they legally couldn't close the line without permission from the National Transport Authority. IE's claims that the line was not making money and that only twenty five people used it everyday were exposed as untrue propaganda.
No Rail Line makes money in rural Ireland, but IE only had one ticket collector between four trains, giving you a one in four chance of riding free! The lie about only twenty five people using the train was proven false by the campaigners making daily head counts of passengers.
Interest grew in the issue, and support for the campaign grew. The South East Chamber of Commerce threw their weight behind the campaign, claiming closure was economic suicide. So did surrounding local authorities, and in theory, all of the political parties of the south east.
On Friday the third of September, The NTA granted permission to IE to close the line. Iarnród Éireann celebrated and the local media reported their victory. However, once again we were being hoodwinked by semi state propaganda. It was left to Tanya Fenelon, the unknown Bridgetown woman who had started a facebook campaign a year earlier, to reveal the truth. The line would close, but with conditions.
The line would have to be maintained. An enhanced bus service would have to provided for South Wexford, and most importantly, private operators would be encouraged to reopen the line.
So the Government have allowed another public service to fall, but thanks to the actions of the Save the Rosslare to Waterford Rail Line campaign,there is still hope. People power, the rebel spirit, is alive in Wexford.
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
Ed O' Brien Remembered
Had Ed O' Brien lived he would have celebrated his thirty sixth birthday in a few weeks. Instead he died on foreign soil fourteen years ago, fighting for the independence and unity of his homeland.
A soldier. A freedom fighter. A patriot.
A twenty one year old who had taken everything he had, everything he was, and placed it on the line for Ireland.
His death placed him in the company of Fr. Murphy, Ph Pearse, Liam Mellowes and Bobby Sands. No one could ever validate an argument that would rule him out of this company, or site his circumstances as being any different from the men who's images now grace the walls of our public buildings and the statues in our parks and town squares.
Because there is no difference.

Ed was vilified by the Irish media when he died. In much the same way, a British soldier killed in Iraq is vilified by the Arab media, while an Iraqi insurgent is vilified by the British. Such is war. Its not black and white.
In 1998, the Irish media again kicked up when Eds image was placed beside other patriots on a poster advertising Gerry Adams famous visit to Vinegar Hill. Gerry rightly refused to apologise for the use of Eds image, as did the organisers.
Shortly afterwards the beautiful Balled of Ed O' Brien was composed by a republican in south Wexford. One singer later told that he had been intimidated while singing the song, and was forced to drop it from his set. Alot of people in Wexford know the words of Boolovogue or Kelly the boy from Killane, but few know the words of the Balled of Ed O' Brien. This should be rectified now.
Today many would like to forget about Ed. They would like to brush his struggle and death under the carpet of political correctness. They would choose to airbrush him out of history as Fianna Fail have airbrushed the assassination of Kevin O' Higgins, and New Labour have have airbrushed their involvement with the OIRA and the death of Seamus Costello.

But Ed is remembered.
A north Wexford SF cumann and a fantastic Republican Flute band are honoured to be named after the Gorey man.
And no matter what happens, no matter how many people we elect to Leinster house, no matter how much nonsense is thrown at us by other "pure" republican groups....we will continue to remember Brave Ed O' Brien.
A soldier. A freedom fighter. A patriot.
A twenty one year old who had taken everything he had, everything he was, and placed it on the line for Ireland.
His death placed him in the company of Fr. Murphy, Ph Pearse, Liam Mellowes and Bobby Sands. No one could ever validate an argument that would rule him out of this company, or site his circumstances as being any different from the men who's images now grace the walls of our public buildings and the statues in our parks and town squares.
Because there is no difference.

Ed was vilified by the Irish media when he died. In much the same way, a British soldier killed in Iraq is vilified by the Arab media, while an Iraqi insurgent is vilified by the British. Such is war. Its not black and white.
In 1998, the Irish media again kicked up when Eds image was placed beside other patriots on a poster advertising Gerry Adams famous visit to Vinegar Hill. Gerry rightly refused to apologise for the use of Eds image, as did the organisers.
Shortly afterwards the beautiful Balled of Ed O' Brien was composed by a republican in south Wexford. One singer later told that he had been intimidated while singing the song, and was forced to drop it from his set. Alot of people in Wexford know the words of Boolovogue or Kelly the boy from Killane, but few know the words of the Balled of Ed O' Brien. This should be rectified now.
Today many would like to forget about Ed. They would like to brush his struggle and death under the carpet of political correctness. They would choose to airbrush him out of history as Fianna Fail have airbrushed the assassination of Kevin O' Higgins, and New Labour have have airbrushed their involvement with the OIRA and the death of Seamus Costello.

But Ed is remembered.
A north Wexford SF cumann and a fantastic Republican Flute band are honoured to be named after the Gorey man.
And no matter what happens, no matter how many people we elect to Leinster house, no matter how much nonsense is thrown at us by other "pure" republican groups....we will continue to remember Brave Ed O' Brien.
Monday, September 6, 2010
The problem with Social Employment
Four hundred and fifty five thousand people currently lie on the live register. A massive figure. A problem that must be resolved immediately using inventive thinking and practical application.
The Government has suggested Social Employment. They want to take ten thousand people off the live register and put them to work at community projects. If it works they plan to add another forty thousand to the scheme.

"Unemployed will have to work for their Dole" screamed the headlines of the O'Reilly media machine rags. Because we all know that the unemployed are lazy and completely to blame for the dire situation they now find themselves in.
455,000 on the live register.
A massive figure. Worth quoting for those people who want to us to believe that it is the paying of social welfare to these people that is stalling economic recovery. These people, the same people who blindly paid tax into the black hole that was government spending during the Tiger years.

But lets talk figures.
How many people are paying income tax in Ireland today?
Some people, particularly the once self employed, find it difficult, and in some cases impossible, to draw benefits.
And how many people are being juggled off the register and onto FAS courses, and back again?
And how many trained workers will be shafted and replaced by the cheaper, new slave caste of Ireland, the Social Employed?

FAS is a failed organisation. Everyday local Social Welfare offices make mistakes that would not be tolerated under any other circumstances but the quasi-anarchism of post tiger Eire. The HSE was supposed to save Ireland's health system but has instead totally destroyed it.

Social Employment will fail for the same reasons.
Poor planning by completely incompetent bureaucrats unfit to serve the Irish people.
Sinn Féin believes that there are many benefits to people working in the community, but this should be done through Community Employment schemes with proper training and employment opportunities rather than through some ill thought out and unstructured idea.
Wexford Sinn Féin Rep, Cllr. Anthony kelly has called for an increase and modernisation of CE schemes to make them more relevant for the needs of society and local Government and the ring fencing of a set number of places for the young unemployed.

Isn't it strange that your news programmes and papers haven't raised these issues instead of implying that the unemployed are lazy and to blame for economic stagnation?
Maybe they're trying to influence your thinking ahead of a devastating budget, which will target those on welfare and public services.
But perish the thought, that would mean that the Irish media is biased, and in breech of its ethical responsibility to report a truthful account of the news.
The Government has suggested Social Employment. They want to take ten thousand people off the live register and put them to work at community projects. If it works they plan to add another forty thousand to the scheme.

"Unemployed will have to work for their Dole" screamed the headlines of the O'Reilly media machine rags. Because we all know that the unemployed are lazy and completely to blame for the dire situation they now find themselves in.
455,000 on the live register.
A massive figure. Worth quoting for those people who want to us to believe that it is the paying of social welfare to these people that is stalling economic recovery. These people, the same people who blindly paid tax into the black hole that was government spending during the Tiger years.

But lets talk figures.
How many people are paying income tax in Ireland today?
Some people, particularly the once self employed, find it difficult, and in some cases impossible, to draw benefits.
And how many people are being juggled off the register and onto FAS courses, and back again?
And how many trained workers will be shafted and replaced by the cheaper, new slave caste of Ireland, the Social Employed?

FAS is a failed organisation. Everyday local Social Welfare offices make mistakes that would not be tolerated under any other circumstances but the quasi-anarchism of post tiger Eire. The HSE was supposed to save Ireland's health system but has instead totally destroyed it.

Social Employment will fail for the same reasons.
Poor planning by completely incompetent bureaucrats unfit to serve the Irish people.
Sinn Féin believes that there are many benefits to people working in the community, but this should be done through Community Employment schemes with proper training and employment opportunities rather than through some ill thought out and unstructured idea.
Wexford Sinn Féin Rep, Cllr. Anthony kelly has called for an increase and modernisation of CE schemes to make them more relevant for the needs of society and local Government and the ring fencing of a set number of places for the young unemployed.

Isn't it strange that your news programmes and papers haven't raised these issues instead of implying that the unemployed are lazy and to blame for economic stagnation?
Maybe they're trying to influence your thinking ahead of a devastating budget, which will target those on welfare and public services.
But perish the thought, that would mean that the Irish media is biased, and in breech of its ethical responsibility to report a truthful account of the news.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

